November 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829 30   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Friday, November 7th, 2003 10:39 pm
What is insanity?

The Sands that I hold in my mind could be called perfectly sane, perhaps.

"What, after all, is a cook?"
What indeed.

All seeming evidence to insanity is perhaps too much evidence of a man who simply doesn't care. Not for human life, not for society's morals, not for fashion; and what are ethics but the currently fashionable modes of judgement?

Is this lack of caring derived from a higher calling, a belief of an order that goes beyond an order called forth as 'sanity', or from a lack of love?

Is love the ultimate measure of being sane?
If so, would not El Mariachi be termed as one lacking sanity as well, having love killed before him 'til nothing matters except perhaps the music?

In regards to the scene with the church shootout, Rodriguez in an interview mentions the violent symbolism of having to destroy a guitar to get to a gun that El Mariachi was ultimately forced to use, a gunshot that shatters the silence of church, echoing like a choir's collected voice.

But I doubt that, in Rodriguez's universe, music was really so far removed from violence.

El seemed to have attempted to choose music above violence, but 'El Mariachi' by definition is the twining of sound and death and a latin beat, caught and tangled and inseparable, and is the stronger for it once El accepts the death and the music together, and re-establishes his loyalty to his land.

The moment an instrument is picked up by him, be it one either of music or death, is the same moment that you sense the rumble of an approaching storm; the guitar contains a gun and, no matter how much he may have wished to preserve the outer mask of music, he could not ignore how violence trails him like fate.

And what is Sands then, separated from his personal theme?
His beat is Mexico, but his lyrics are Judy Garland's, are from a culture insistent on its own inherent superiority. His initial theme jars; it clashes, broken edged and holey.

What is missing?

He is Sheldon Jeffery Sands, and what has he left behind, for Mexico?

And does he care, then, of / for Mexico? What does he care of its people, its culture, its clothes, its norms, its language even? He refuses it all, and absolutely refuses to believe that any part of it is worthwhile.

Shoot the cook, because the pork is too good.

Bring the balance, because for America to exist there has to be a Mexico, because idealism gets shredded in Mexico's shantyhills, because someone always has to suffer and why should he suffer alone?

Begin the second stanza,
and we see that he has seen too much, and Mexico claims him, and *look*: Sands finds a new song, develops a new Theme, sloughs off his tourist skin and bears the colors of Dia de los Meurtos, all black and pale and red.

Blood mixing with Mexico's dust, coating skin and sockets and bullet holes.

An offering to the land.

Because look: he has a song now. He has a legend.

He is claimed by Mexico,

and bound as surely as El is.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:06 am (UTC)
:O

Can I have your plot babies? Please?
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:15 am (UTC)
LOL I can't write a sex scene either. But your insights...dear GOD! If I had those I would be writing the best OUaTiM fic EVAR!!!111oneone!!11
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:24 am (UTC)
You are so brilliant that I made My dear spouse sit down and read this post.

Just...BRILLIANT.

I would be more articulate...but um..why is the rum gone? heeeeeeee!
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:26 am (UTC)
::applauds::

Now I will ruin it by commenting that while scanning my friends list after having already read this, I managed to misread the second 'o' in 'cook' as a 'c'.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:46 am (UTC)
"Is this lack of caring derived from a higher calling, a belief of an order that goes beyond an order called forth as 'sanity', or from a lack of love?"

I think Sands believes that he sees the world with an objectivity that puts him above conventional ideas of right and wrong. He is the one who sees what needs to be done to 'keep the balance' and this is his highest duty. Individuals are of no consequence other than for the part they play in the overall pattern, so if they need to be eliminated then he'll do it without even considering them personally. And he is superior to others because he's the one who sees the overall picture.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:50 am (UTC)
(Spouse would be the XY model, not that there's anything wrong with that...)

Estel said he also confirms your brilliance and articulacy and depth of insight and all that. and it that I wasn't just being really easily impressed because am droonken.

('Cause someone has to stay all sober like to be ready to take the kidlings to the ER in case of stitches or whatever emergency might possibly occur.)

I'll try to cap it for you tomorrow, since I don't trust my ability to hook the wires up in anything like the correct order at the moment.

Also, time to tuck little ones in their beds, and read Dr. Suess and A.A.Milne and other non-fear and loathing type materials. *whang* I believe that was the sound of my psychological whiplash occurring.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 07:52 am (UTC)
AHAHAHAHAHA

I did the same thing.

read porn much?
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 08:09 am (UTC)
Wow. That was great. You really captured El and Sands.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 08:31 am (UTC)
'El Mariachi' by definition is the twining of sound and death and a latin beat

Your mind is an utterly fascinating place to be
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 08:36 am (UTC)
V. thought-provoking and compelling. I always saw them as forced into their roles, with more or less anger at their subsequent need to adapt, depending on which set of muses I currently had speaking. Sure, they may be happier once through the looking glass, but the process is highly unpleasant.

That said, I'd like to express gratitude for how much inspiration you're constantly giving me. Whether it be written or visual *smirking*. Any more picspam? And why do people keep connecting with "cut-glass hipbones"? Is there a Johnny pic I don't know about?
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 08:45 am (UTC)
But it was beautiful vague. ^_^

And this was beautiful as well. ...and thought provoking, and bunny spawning, and making me wanna see the bloody movie again something fierce. Hurry up DVD release date, hurry!! Stupid end of January. -_-;
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 09:11 am (UTC)
*offers consoling pats and economy-size jug of chocolate syrup*
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 09:25 am (UTC)
Shirt's still in the way. Damn.

El started the whole killing deal as vengeance for a specific event (first girlfriend dead; hand shot so he can't play like he used so), so I get the feeling he's frustrated at having to continue doing it, because he's gotten tired of revenge. In the trilogy, he really started out as a naive, innocent guy (being a traditional mariachi in a world of synthesizers and canned music takes a certain blindness), and then Rodriguez sent him through hell, basically. I agree that Sands seems to hate his job, and it seems like all that 'kill the cook' is just boredom. A way to keep his edge in a country where the kids trade bullet casings. But I also get the impression that he likes the mentality of being CIA.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 09:31 am (UTC)
Ouch. That makes me never want to write OUATIM fic again, because I'm never going to get that understanding.


Let's hear it for persistence.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 10:20 am (UTC)
IMO, Sands has the most vulnerable character in the movie, despite his seeming to believe that he is invulnerable. That CIA t-shirt, for example. He made no attempt to hide what he was. And that first scene, sitting with his back to the door, when any sane person expecting trouble would have sat facing the door. It's as if he choose not to see right from the beginning. Loosing his eyes is just a symbol of his blindness that is there right from the start.

It's interesting that the whole debacle took place during the Day of the Dead. In the Celtic tradition, that's Samhain, when the God dies. Sands, I'd guess, his own personal god, pulling everyone's strings. So what is he now? Human certainly. That must have been quite a shock to him. I'd love to see (no pun intended) what he does now.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 10:28 am (UTC)
!!!!!

Eee, slap me, in all my sensitive self. I'm so damn touchy when it comes to getting motivated or inspired. Anything can just, wham, kill it.

But I won't stop, I promise!
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 11:26 am (UTC)
Yep, all that great symbolism is one of the reasons why I love the movie so much. What happened to Sands...the skull like banners and face painting of the people in the Day of the Dead Parade...how he traded his t-shirts and silly mustaches for a black suit and gloves and guns. Becoming the Angel of Death, in a way. Crying his tears of blood for all the injustice in the world. At, at least, in Mexico.

I doubt it was a coincidence that he claimed he was there to keep the balance...and then to have him lose his eyes, becoming the traditional picture of blind justice holding her scales. But that is Sands the Legend, who has just been claimed and has become a living spiritual part of Mexico as you said, as opposed to Sands the Man, who still can be a complete and utter asshole at times if he really wants to be. :)

And yeah, El Mariachi never asked to become El Mariachi. His name alone is a clue to the fact that he symbolizes more than just himself...he is THE Mariachi. Nameless...a wandering guitarist with a guitarcase full of guns, killing off those who would make their money off the backs of the poor and the downtrodden.

And then the whole bit at the end of the movie between him and Carolina...what he wants most in the world is liberty...him walking down the road wearing the sash of Mexico...hmph...pretty dern clear. Just as Sands appearing at the very end of the credits sort of implies that he is now also a part of the Mexican group soul. A Mexican archetype. A living embodiment of justice, but the justice of the dead...who still involve themselves with the living, their relations.

Yeah, like you commented...very nicely, too...they are both bound to the land now. To the life and fate and destiny and joys and sorrows of Mexico.

Oh yeah...WHEN is it coming out on DVD?!?! (sigh)

CopperRose





Saturday, November 8th, 2003 03:17 pm (UTC)
Just wanted to mention that I visited your gorgeous website, and Restraint II: Lazarus is basically me stealing your wonderful interp. and tossing a plot at it. Thank you so much.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 03:21 pm (UTC)
Well, legends are things that don't really (or don't seem to really) exist anymore, but should, which fits 'mariachi' in modern Mexico pretty well. It's like the American outlaw/Robin Hood figure--nobody rides around robbing banks on a horse with six-shooters nowadays, but you can still see echoes of it.

Y'know, we seem to have better discussions off-community than on it. Bizarre.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 04:47 pm (UTC)
mmm. did someone say soft-serve gay ice cream?
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 04:59 pm (UTC)
Hmmmm. Interesting.

Sands is, as far as I can tell, a classic pyschopath. In the psychiatric terminology, psychopathy and sociopathy are both, on the surface the same thing--a person with either feels no regret. They feel other emotions, but not regret. The key difference lies in how they get that way. A psychopath is born, a sociopath is made. Most sociopaths suffer terrible abuse as a child, usually sexual in nature.

Most serial murderers are sociopaths. Psychopaths generally tend to realise that while they won't feel guilt over killing someone, they *will* get caught and incur some unpleasant consequences. Of course, like anyone else, they can be pushed over the edge, but, by and large, they're law-abiding citizens. You probably even know someone who could be diagnosed as psychopathic, although you might not know that they are.

Most sociopaths continue the cycle, abusing others in the way they were abused. It's quite possible for you to know a sociopath and not realise it, as well. Not all of them are murderers, and the polite, nicely dressed businessman you just had lunch with may go home and beat the shit out of his son.

Sands is, from what I can tell, a psychopath who found a way to indulge his boredom. I'm no expert in human psychology, but the way Depp played him, he doesn't seem to exhibit any signs of a past that might have made him into a sociopath, and Rodriguez doesn't hint at one in the script/filmography.

I figure that Sands went into the CIA because it was more fun than anything else available, and generally he wasn't going to suffer the same kind of consequences an ordinary citizen.
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 06:02 pm (UTC)
A button! yes. Good!

And, man... is THIS post freaky when you skim it. I'm going ot have to come back and READ this post when I get back from HORSEBACK RIDING today!

Res
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 06:16 pm (UTC)
seeing someone wanting to say it, and knowing all the right words, that was... that's just... that's the world.
great minds do think (and sing, and sink...) alike...
Saturday, November 8th, 2003 11:54 pm (UTC)
Oh dear, I am giggling madly! I honestly didn't see that! I am soooo old! I can't even blame it on the print, as I saw OUATIM at two different cinemas. (Unless, they both had duff prints, yes, that was it!) Or I need my eyes tested and my glasses prescription changed! *giggling hysterically now* Oh well, it still fits, the big letters (for those of us who, it seems, need big print) reading CIA. Still fits my theory! (With a shoehorn!)

Oy vey. (Very embarrased and wandering away, muttering inanely to myself.)
Sunday, November 9th, 2003 01:06 am (UTC)
N...no! I swear!

Not *much*.
Sunday, November 9th, 2003 07:21 pm (UTC)
*Smacks head on desk repeatedly due to having only seen OUaTiM once before it left theaters*