Found a most hilarious post on A/L today written by
lannamichaels (as pointed out by
twinkledru in a further post here)
The FotR recap is more of a straightforward A/L scene-by-scene breakdown. But in the TT recap...
They see Gandalf. Aragorn kneels, Legolas stands, Gimli is gruff. Aragorn, by the way, looks delightful on his knees, which is why he kneels later for Theoden. Or maybe that's just to blow him. We all need a little lovin' sometimes.
::grins:: ah me ah my but I love the snark.
(Incidentally, I've always found the "You're late and you need a bath" scene where Aragorn comes back as snark between guy friends...)
[]
widget285 makes a good point about the fluidity and translucence of truth...
[]
hesychasm discusses the use and role of subtext (does sex simplify complex relationships into something easier to understand and control?)
I'm not sure what my response to the stated question is, but (in response to a point raised in the entry) I think that one can't just leave the subtext alone. Or perhaps more clearly, *I* can't leave the subtext alone: I have too much of an urge to prod the thing like an open wound. I have too much love for trying to seek out others who may see the same subtext, if nothing else than to just convince myself that no, I'm not just seeing things because I want it to be.
Skimming out the subtext is a huge part of the fun, for me, in watching movies or reading stories.
I think this might have a great deal with how I *adore* a finely written bit of denial and unspoken plot/backhistory, I'm so used to skimming out the subtext of my media that reading anything straightforward now seem shallow and one-dimensional.
And I'm not even talking specifically about *pairing* subtext either. For instance:
Surface(HP) is a marvelously layered tale with tons of *characterization* subtext.
Sparrow(PotC) has an entire *plot* as subtext, smooshed into a trim and effective 50 words.
Into the Dark(OUaTiM) is one where bare and simple words and sentances weaves around each other into a suprisingly *emotional* gut-punch of a fic.
I wonder how much of my love for reading and writing a story that tells itself sideways is due to how all stories have been told. To write an original story, at this point, I think we're near forced to tell a story in pauses, like how a song is made stronger with it's downbeat, like how a hammock is 85% air and a cat's cradle of string.
The FotR recap is more of a straightforward A/L scene-by-scene breakdown. But in the TT recap...
They see Gandalf. Aragorn kneels, Legolas stands, Gimli is gruff. Aragorn, by the way, looks delightful on his knees, which is why he kneels later for Theoden. Or maybe that's just to blow him. We all need a little lovin' sometimes.
::grins:: ah me ah my but I love the snark.
(Incidentally, I've always found the "You're late and you need a bath" scene where Aragorn comes back as snark between guy friends...)
[]
[]
I'm not sure what my response to the stated question is, but (in response to a point raised in the entry) I think that one can't just leave the subtext alone. Or perhaps more clearly, *I* can't leave the subtext alone: I have too much of an urge to prod the thing like an open wound. I have too much love for trying to seek out others who may see the same subtext, if nothing else than to just convince myself that no, I'm not just seeing things because I want it to be.
Skimming out the subtext is a huge part of the fun, for me, in watching movies or reading stories.
I think this might have a great deal with how I *adore* a finely written bit of denial and unspoken plot/backhistory, I'm so used to skimming out the subtext of my media that reading anything straightforward now seem shallow and one-dimensional.
And I'm not even talking specifically about *pairing* subtext either. For instance:
Surface(HP) is a marvelously layered tale with tons of *characterization* subtext.
Sparrow(PotC) has an entire *plot* as subtext, smooshed into a trim and effective 50 words.
Into the Dark(OUaTiM) is one where bare and simple words and sentances weaves around each other into a suprisingly *emotional* gut-punch of a fic.
I wonder how much of my love for reading and writing a story that tells itself sideways is due to how all stories have been told. To write an original story, at this point, I think we're near forced to tell a story in pauses, like how a song is made stronger with it's downbeat, like how a hammock is 85% air and a cat's cradle of string.
no subject
As for origfic, I'm writing that again as well as fanfic, so I have to say that they're still not comparable worlds. On the one hand, I don't have to worry over canon. On the other, now I have to paint and dabble and just swipe the color all over; I can't just sketch anymore and expect the reader to fill in the blanks.
no subject
I'm honoured and pleased that you think well enough of my little half-drabble to have used it as an example!
no subject
As for the origfic, the advantages and drawbacks you've mentioned make sense, tho from assumption more than from experience because I've never written origfic before.
no subject
no subject
*mad grinning*
Speaking of, just can't seem to let FDTD drop the curtain after the...ah...honeymoon night. Am writing more right now. Erk.
no subject
... uh... not much else to say, but I thought I'd let you know I like what you post.
no subject