Monday, July 11th, 2005 12:20 pm
Edible Meat Can be Grown in a Lab on Industrial Scale

via [livejournal.com profile] telophase

[]

thought in response to comments: is this partially creepy 'cause most of the more integrated aspects of tissue enginnering is skin grafts (burn victims) and so lab-grown meat is associated with cannibalism? or is it just on principle?
Monday, July 11th, 2005 12:29 pm (UTC)
How cool! Thanks for the link. . .
Monday, July 11th, 2005 12:56 pm (UTC)
Have you ever read Oryx and Crake? One of its (many) disturbing images is that of a bioengineered chicken that is a bunch of giant blobby breast meat and a gullet, for feeding.

I guess this is marginally less ooky than that, but it still grosses me out.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:06 pm (UTC)
It's a wonderful book. I'm hot and cold on Margaret Atwood -- sometimes I adore her and sometimes I'm annoyed by her. This is one of the very good ones, though.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:02 pm (UTC)
I can't decide if that's cool or creepy.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:06 pm (UTC)
And PETA will still say it's evil.

Still, dude, that is so cool! (Can we engineer meat to provide nutrients not readily available in impoverished areas? Huh? Huh? *bounces*)
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:11 pm (UTC)
I really don't agree. PETA works to prevent cruelty to animals, and this is not animals we're talking about, but single-cells.

It's unreasonable to assume that PETA will take the same kind of "domino" stand as the right-wing anti-choice folks, who *need* to argue that stem cell research is wrong in order to argue against abortions in general.

In this case, the single-cell tissue growth would prevent the slaughter of animals, and I just can't imagine an ethical argument against it, except perhaps that meat isn't necessary at *all*, so perhaps spending time and energy on this technology is time and energy that could be spent in other ways, toward, for instance, promoting a healthier, meatless diet worldwide.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:12 pm (UTC)
I'm torn between "neat!" and "ewww!"
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:22 pm (UTC)
Because, because ... sheets of meat! Meat makers! Not meat from an animal, just ... meat. Meat that is not parts of animals is a scary thing.

Of course, I'm sure many people feel "eww" about meat being parts of animals, so I don't think my visceral feeling that this is Just Not Right will be universal.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:33 pm (UTC)
No, I'm right with you on the "meat is from animals" page. I want to know where on the cow my burger came from, you know?
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:22 pm (UTC)
I can't remember exactly what it was, but wasn't there at least one SF movie with this premise? Only it made it all evil and stuff? I think exposure to Cold War era SF tends to give you residual suspicion of any kind of food engineering, but it's been a while since I went digging...
Monday, July 11th, 2005 07:05 pm (UTC)
The general idea gets referenced a lot in nearly all SF--humanity's exhausted its resources/can't grow food fast enough, so they turn to artificial cultivation. There, the disgust factor is usually Matrix-esque: it tastes right, but who the fuck really knows what's in it (and have most people missed the fact that the Matrix set-up was cannibalistic? Liquefied humans got fed to growing humans?).
Monday, July 11th, 2005 01:33 pm (UTC)
Huh. That's really interesting.

Sheets of meat! Nifty! And slightly gross. But nifty!

(Of course, I'm kinda fond of the idea of my meat coming from discernable parts of animals.)
Monday, July 11th, 2005 08:05 pm (UTC)
Oh, now I'm imagining beef-flavored taffy.

Ew.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 08:13 pm (UTC)
And to clarify:
my concerns about lab-grown meat would be along the lines of "Engineered meat? What went into it? What's been tweaked?" Even buying meat now, I tend to go for butchers who carve up their own meat, who know where their slabs of meat are coming from, more or less. Best lamb I've ever had was in Australia: ranch-grown and not fed anything but whatever it foraged.

I do try to avoid engineered produce, when possible (which, here in the USA, is rarely, but I try) because there just hasn't been enough research into some of it to ease my mind: I'm all for feeding people, but I (being rich on the global scale and therefore having the luxury to say this and still eat) would like more trials and checking-out done first. Putting potato genes into apples is great in theory: if one is safe and the other is safe, the two together are safe, right? My grandma tried that with bleach and ammonia: didn't work so well.


And I suppose there's part of me that's more suspicious and paranoid than skeptical. Though even that part of me admits that the possibilities here are amazing. And the idea of giant sheets of meat is kinda cool, in its own creepy way.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:03 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the link! That's...yeah, I'm torn between being creeped out and amazed. If you're ever feeling adventurous, try 'Quorn'--it's a line of frozen dinners that're 'meat' but made entirely of fungus (I've had some. It's convincing!)
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:16 pm (UTC)
This is amazing. And also totally grossing me out. I don't really know why, my automatic reation just seems to be "Meat grown in labs? Eeeeww!" *whimpers*
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:53 pm (UTC)
I don't know! Just the whole growing-flesh thing. It sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi movie. *quivers*
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:21 pm (UTC)
That is too cool! I love that!
(Anonymous)
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:41 pm (UTC)
=D icon is so appropriate!
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:38 pm (UTC)
Comment on your thought in response to comments. ::grin::

I think what I'm finding creepy isn't so much the idea of the finished product, it's the idea of rooms. Full of. Sheets. Of. Meat.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:48 pm (UTC)
Yes. ::nods::
Monday, July 11th, 2005 02:59 pm (UTC)
Hmmm, my first thought was "yay! no more guilt about loving kielbasa!" I really ought to be a vegetarian on animal rights principles...

but hey, I'm all for bioengineered plants, too. put me firm on the 'feeding people is a good thing' side.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 03:58 pm (UTC)
Honestly, and I really don't know why, but it disgusts me. But, to give it a true thought, it would comfort my mind about eating living creatures (I'm trying to be a vegetarian, but it's alot difficult than it should be). It's a good thing, in the end, is what I'd say. If they can engineer this, there should be much hope for the med field.
Monday, July 11th, 2005 10:53 pm (UTC)
As a vegetarian for moral reasons, I think this technology is brilliant! The ewww factor is the way I feel about eating animals. I don't understand why non-vegetarians would be grossed out by this and not by eating something that breathed and felt pain and pleasure.
Tuesday, July 12th, 2005 10:45 am (UTC)
Huh, fascinating... thanks for the link!

I'm "mostly pesco-vegetarian" -- I eat fish, eggs, and occasionally game meats, and I find this much *less* disturbing than what's been reported about the factory farming practices that have been going on for years.

However, I do find it a bit disturbing that there's no mention of what would be used to "feed" the meat... it's still living animal tissue which has still got to get its energy and nutrition from somewhere...
Tuesday, July 12th, 2005 09:27 pm (UTC)
I think for me the squick factor would be the "Do I really trust labs more than hundreds of years of evolution." Only I don't know if that counts for me because I'm not actually squicked, really. I would totally eat it.

But then --> college student. I'll eat anything, really. Especially if it's supposedly healthier, because then it's guilt free on multiple levels. I love those green odwalla shakes, and they're chock full o' algae spirulina.