permetaform (
permetaform) wrote2005-08-27 11:01 pm
Vid Question!
'kay, color me curious, but what do ya'll consider a 'shipper vid? Or a relationship vid?
Like for instance, I consider 'Why' to be simultaneously a Lex vid and a Clex vid, in the way that 'The Fragile' was a Leeloo vid and a Leeloo/Corbin vid. But would one consider one vid-type more 'shippery than the other? If so why?
The reason I ask is 'cause I'd realized (with help) that Moment Couldn't Break could be considered a non-shipper vid...possibly 'cause we vidded a relationship subtext? (Which amuses me SO MUCH)
Then again I'm wondering if it's more of this consideration that I've posted about before, where one's concept of a relationship would alter whether one sees a relationship in a particular text at all.
...which possibly should disturb me that I'm okay with so much dysfunction in a relationship. ::blinks::
::pokes at the several open Sasuke/Naruto fics on desktop:: heh.
Like for instance, I consider 'Why' to be simultaneously a Lex vid and a Clex vid, in the way that 'The Fragile' was a Leeloo vid and a Leeloo/Corbin vid. But would one consider one vid-type more 'shippery than the other? If so why?
The reason I ask is 'cause I'd realized (with help) that Moment Couldn't Break could be considered a non-shipper vid...possibly 'cause we vidded a relationship subtext? (Which amuses me SO MUCH)
Then again I'm wondering if it's more of this consideration that I've posted about before, where one's concept of a relationship would alter whether one sees a relationship in a particular text at all.
...which possibly should disturb me that I'm okay with so much dysfunction in a relationship. ::blinks::
::pokes at the several open Sasuke/Naruto fics on desktop:: heh.
no subject
Of course, that's in theory. In practice, I think it's a lot harder to quantify. If you support (or alternately, hold a hatred for) a pairing in the show or source footage, you are probably more likely to pick it up as subtext in a video than someone who does not care either way or simply does not see it at all. This is especially true in videos like your "Why" or, alternately, my FLV, where the ship is not the central focus -- relationships are an aspect, of course, but they're not the main idea of the video. They're not all that the video is saying. In general, I tend to regard "ship" video versus non-"ship" video as having to do with the overall idea of the video. For instance -- if you're vidding a character, a theme or idea, and the relationship is subtext within it...I don't consider that a ship video. For something to actually be a ship video for me, the ship has to be at the foreground -- it has to be the argument you're making.
Linzee
no subject
Ahh, okay, that makes sense then! 'Cause I consider Moment Couldn't Break as first a Kurdy vid...though it's a Kurdy vid With Jeremiah As Very Important.
typo
no subject
It is interesting though to watch what videos get thought of as "shipper" and what ones don't. I've found, especially once you leave the vidding fandom and go into general fannish communities, things tend to become a lot more skewed in terms of what is and isn't a ship -- namely, *everything* becomes a shipper video. Perhaps this is the result of people wanting to read their own favorites into a vid?
Linzee
no subject
Maybe I think. I wonder too if it's one of the easiest ways to 'read' a vid? Like, it's harder to portray a mentor relationship vid without it being considered a 'ship vid, I could see might take
Which brings up the interesting point of how one might portray an intense platonic relationship via vid for most of the audience...like, is it even possible? Especially considering the main audience for our vids is fandom and is naturally skewed to look in that direction?
no subject
You know, I've been thinking about this a *lot* in the last month or so. I have a video I want to make this winter that I'm nervous as hell about, because it deals with two characters (one very underage) and I'm worried that the very idea of a two-character-centric video will be automatically translated into "slash" once I get outside of the vidding fandom. Unfortunately, once we as vidders send our vids out into the 'wilds,' there isn't much we can do in terms of insuring that it doesn't get viewed in a certian way. Fandom is extremely skewed, as you mentioned, to "ship" almost automatically. As to why this is, that's probably another question entirely, but it does make it difficult when attempting to capture non-sexual or more nuanced relationships in vidding, which is so very much dependent on how one views the original footage -- a vidder can do everything in their power to capture their own view of the nuances and non-sexual aspects of two (or more!) characters...but ultimately I think it comes down to the interpretation of the person who clicks 'play.'
Linzee
no subject
no subject
Oh, wait...
A 'ship vid puts the emphasis on two (or more) characters and constructs or emphasizes their romance.
That's the simple explanation.
A gen vid does not emphasize the relationship. It won't use the same clips. And if it does, it tries (not always successfully) to contextualize them as gen.
"What I did for love" was intended as a gen vid, but a great many people read it as slash, because the end of ST2 shows up in every K/S vid.
no subject
In my own character studies, there is almost always a relationship involved -- "Ing", for instance, talks a whole lot about Anya's relationship with Xander. But that doesn't make it a 'ship vid. It's still very clearly about Anya primarily, with the relationship being used to show things about Anya herself.
IMO, for a vid to be a 'ship vid, the relationship itself has to be the primary focus.
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/1620684/
It goes on and on my frieeeeeend...;D
Oh! And look up someone called sugahlei. Divisions gets better after the first few chapters; White, Surge Red is just hot.
no subject
It distracted me for a day, and then I went back to SGA crack, but now I've run out again.
no subject
http://www.fanfiction.net/u/485373/
and on
no subject
So at it's core: a focus on people and the feelings that connect them together.
no subject
no subject
Shipper vids for me have to specifically focus on the relationship (or subtext there of). Romantic shipper vids anyway. But there is, to me, a difference between showing how a character may be affected by certain relationships, and specifically showing those relationships through the eyes of one or both of the characters.
no subject
There's an Angel/Spike vid by Sisabet (I think) that will utterly convince you that Spike and Angel were having violent, kinky sex on screen in BtVS, and that it's going to pop up any second now in the video, just through the pacing and the clips she chose.