So, I wonder.
Sometimes I don't get pro-writers, and their virulent hatred towards fic. I think, perhaps is that they feel all defensive and threatened.
I wonder, because for me, fanfic is like singing; I don't sing all that well, and I don't sing professionally. But I sing because it gives me joy, I sing because I can't *help* singing. And granted, most of my singing is in the bathroom or in the car, but I'm not going around going "OMG COPYRIGHTS" to people who sing for fun, 'cause while I sometimes sing tuneless songs most of the time I sing songs made by professional songwriters/artists. And sometimes I do riff and trills and grace-notes to decorate the song because it's fun to. Because I can't help it, because it bring me joy. I make no profit from singing, and I would say that most people who sing don't do it for profit.
Will the anti-fic people wish to rail against karaoke bars now, too? For violating the copywrite laws of singers/songwriters?
This post brought to you by
metafandom and silly people.
[edit] "pro-writer" in the context of this post is referring to those who are using it as their label instead of "anti-fic", in particular the group that thinks that writing isn't valid unless you're getting paid for it (or eventually getting paid for it), and that anyone doing it for free is at best absurd and at worst a thief.
Sometimes I don't get pro-writers, and their virulent hatred towards fic. I think, perhaps is that they feel all defensive and threatened.
I wonder, because for me, fanfic is like singing; I don't sing all that well, and I don't sing professionally. But I sing because it gives me joy, I sing because I can't *help* singing. And granted, most of my singing is in the bathroom or in the car, but I'm not going around going "OMG COPYRIGHTS" to people who sing for fun, 'cause while I sometimes sing tuneless songs most of the time I sing songs made by professional songwriters/artists. And sometimes I do riff and trills and grace-notes to decorate the song because it's fun to. Because I can't help it, because it bring me joy. I make no profit from singing, and I would say that most people who sing don't do it for profit.
Will the anti-fic people wish to rail against karaoke bars now, too? For violating the copywrite laws of singers/songwriters?
This post brought to you by
[edit] "pro-writer" in the context of this post is referring to those who are using it as their label instead of "anti-fic", in particular the group that thinks that writing isn't valid unless you're getting paid for it (or eventually getting paid for it), and that anyone doing it for free is at best absurd and at worst a thief.
Tags:
no subject
I'm sorry that I seem to disrespect my fellow fans through my careless words.
no subject
Well, I hope I didn't come across as, like, trying to lecture you or anything-- I'm just being pedantic. ^_^
What's amazing to me how many "pro" authors will simultaneously sneer at amateurs who write for the pure love of writing, and also look down their nose at "popular" authors who write what sells. Hey, if the measure of literary quality is whether you're making money, then sexy vampire romance novels are the best genre of books in America, pornographic manga is the best literature coming out of Japan, and JK Rowling and Stephen King are the most talented writers in the world. *G* And I say this as someone who enjoys sexy vampire romance novels, pornographic manga, JK Rowling and Stephen King-- sadly, that's not how it works!
no subject
And...you're right, I never realized that double-standard existed before. Wow...someone should use that argument the next time these debates come around!