November 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829 30   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, August 21st, 2004 03:52 pm
This is a theory, and I might just be talking out of my ass, but I think I *might* know why anime vids tend towards the seizure inducing.

Part of the problem is that the *average* anime watcher appears to listen to music that moves along at a fair clip. To find an anime vid that uses slow music is *extremely* rare.

But part of the problem is inherent within the source itself.

Namely, regarding anime source, it's far more difficult to create internal motion in anime than in live action. For live action source, it's the opposite (it's far more difficult to create external motion).

[internal motion: motion that occurs within the scene. ex. shooting gun, falling body, kicking]

[external motion: camera movement. ex. zoom, pan, rotate]


But see, that's not a problem with live action vidding; the vidder can create external motion by manipulating the source clips. (want more info? I've written how-to's here and here)

But, for the opposite problem in anime source, how do you create internal motion? You can fiddle around with masks (but that uses already present source) or you photoshop frame by frame (which is utterly insane).

To keep up with the speed and movement of a song, an anime vidder is therefore forced to fall back on creating more external motion themselves, ie. tons of effects and fast clipping.

And honestly, part of issue is also with how much closer the average anime vidder works with the music. The rhythm, timing, and the way they correlate to the visuals are vital in a community that doesn't give similar weight to storytelling. It is vital in a community where near *everyone* is pan-fandom and yet highly likely to have never seen the anime you're vidding. (As for live action vidding, aLOT more weight is given to the story, and in general vidders are vidding for people very familiar with the source.)

Incidentally, I think that making a vid strong in rhythm and timing, and making it visually interesting (through effects and through penetrable clip choice) is one of the surest ways to make your vid accessible to people unfamiliar with the fandom.

ie. fill it with The Shiny!

['penetrable clip choice': made up description to refer to clips easily understandable by new viewers.
Example: the shot on "one hand clapping" for Jig of Life by shallot. It makes sense visually, relating the sound of a gun clap to the idea of a hand clap, even though I don't know the context of the scene]


[]

Happy Birthday [livejournal.com profile] siobhan_w, [livejournal.com profile] pandarus, [livejournal.com profile] potterwitch, [livejournal.com profile] isagel, and [livejournal.com profile] rozfics! May your years be filled with color and song! =)
Thursday, August 26th, 2004 05:03 pm (UTC)
Well I must say it's like walking over a hill and discovering a whole other world on the other side.

I knew vidding was in all areas of fandom (mostly through fellow amv-ers who have been makng sci-fi videos since the 70s or something) but I didn't know there was so much coordinated and written about.

The differences are facinating, not only the differences between the techniques in the two forms but also the fandom and appreciation. I'd post all my thoughts but at this point I'm not sure I can totaly clarify them :)


I found this thread via friend gravenimaj who makes wonderful thought provoking videos which I foolishly failed to recommend earlier. I've seen much discussion of vividcon of late and read a whole bunch of con reviews (where I found my video mentioned). It's all very interesting to me as I do dabble in live action stuff as well (although animated works are more suited to my editing tastes, but that's for a later discussion :P).

I think one thing I've witnessed (which there is a painful lack of in the amv community) is actual detailed analysis of structural elements. Video criticism in the amv community has really become simply 1) "Did I like it" and 2) Was it techincally executed well. While both valid points to make it has changed the focus of amv making a great deal since the digital revolution to the point where basics such as narrative are lost due to anal micromanagement. It's rare to have a balance of the two and nobody EVER talks about narrative. Actual discussion of the creation process has really just become talk of technical with the really talented ones not really divulging their methodologies and hence limiting discourse. It's a shame really, so it's very refreshing to see it frequently discussed here.

I think it's likely that I'll be popping in from time to time and dabbling a little more in other vid fandoms. Things are always a little busy for me as I'm currently running animemusicvideos.org but I'm always happy to talk about video editing.

Some meta you might be interested in are the interviews with a few creators that are hosted on the org - they give an insight into their creative processes and... other things :)

There's other stuff too I'm sure but I'll return when I've had more of a think. There's lots more recs I could make... LOTS. I think of the amv.org top lists the Top Favourite list has a very good selection. The top 10% list is good too but a little more prone to clique fan bias I feel.

OK I'll shut up for now :)
Thursday, August 26th, 2004 05:06 pm (UTC)
ack P.S. I noticed you quoted "The basic principles of matching audio and visuals are pretty simple... it's just that lots of people don't pay enough attention to their audio. Once you actually start really listening to the song it all falls into place."

I wrote that :) It made me very happy to see that referred to :D

I could do with expanding that page a little as it happens.