So it looks like I'm going to Escapade this year! Color me squeeful. =D And
lierdumoa and I thought that we might do a panel this year and submitted this suggestion to the Escapade website.
Good idea/bad idea?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Deus Dētrū́ditur Machina
Wherein "God is returned to the machine." TV shows that tell stories without the cookie cutter morality.
We’ve all lived through the Jossverse’s cult of redemption and the excessive sermonizing in Harry Potter fanon. Not every bad deed needs to be punished; not every protagonist is a hero. The panel will include discussion of the post-modernist themes of Stargate: Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica vs. the modernist themes of Firefly, etc.
Audience participation encouraged. (pardon our bad Latin)
Good idea/bad idea?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But that just sounds like it would great fun to discuss. Anti-heros, plot intricacies, muddied concepts. Brainfood! If you get approved, you need to do a play by play or some type of reindition of it afterwards. *grins*
no subject
no subject
no subject
We have the approval, now all we need is the time slot. But do attend, do! I'd love to meet others from the fandom. ^_^
no subject
no subject
no subject
YAY!
no subject
no subject
no subject
oooo, will there be vid-watching there, I presume? (and I'm planning to have a couple of SGA data dvds on hand for pimp purposes...)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*Icon is killing me! Poor Steve!*
no subject
and yeah, Steve is upset that his foodstuffs are starving him...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You'd do that? :D :D :D
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But a quick response:
re: Mal - he's a Hero with issues and snark, and in denial of his looking for redemption, which was the whole push of Serenity the movie
no subject
... Maybe I'm confused or missing something here, but... I would have said SGA was much more cookie-cutter than Firefly! Rodney is, frankly, a wanker in SG-1 but slowly redeems himself throughout the new series as his character is developed; the Wraith are, despite their biological imperative, portrayed as not just vicious, but evil; and we keep coming across the same old Nietschean societies just *one* rung behind Earth on the technological ladder, that always manage to snafu things up.
Whereas in Firefly, the entire team has a mixture of moralities ranging from the genuinely altruistic (Simon, Book; but even Book hints at a darker past) to the completely selfish and amoral (Jayne) and yet still manage to get along. They aren't looking for redemption or heroism, they are just out to survive, without being too bad along the way--but only if opportunity presents them with that choice. I thought this series was fantastically novel for its portrayal of real people, good mixed with bad and decidedly quirky morals, out to buck the authority figures of their milieu; how many other SF shows back the *rebels*, since the original Star Wars? And it has to be admitted that, despite the lurking undertone of ghastly deeds, the Alliance *does* provide for its citizens very well, in the main; I could draw many parallels with current Earth governments... they are not the evil protagonists of Darth Sidious, Goa'uld or Wraith proportions!
And as for Battlestar Galactica, I'm witholding judgement until we see more of the plot unfold. I can't tell what's going to happen, which is certainly a hook, and it definitely blurs the lines of good/evil dualism, but I can't really envision that the Cylons will win at the end of the day...
Those are my thoughts :) Not trying to provoke a row, just enjoy discussion!
no subject
I was confused by your post-modernist/modernist terms, I think, assuming that 'post-modernist' must be the interesting slant...
How come stark dualism, toeing the line etc. is post-modernist? That's surely a very old viewpoint in story...
I admit I don't know the terminology and that can't be helping!
no subject
oh, don't worry about it, this is the type of comments we wanted, Escapade is created on controversial panels.
no subject
But some quick responses:
Nietschean societies just *one* rung behind Earth on the technological ladder - ex. Ronon's gun is more advanced than anything Earth has
re: Wraith - they're just shepherds. ;D The pun is fun to be chewed on, and deliberate I think, esp after the commentaries.
re: Mal - he's a Hero with issues, and in denial of his looking for redemption, which was the whole push of Serenity the movie
no subject
Yes, Ronon's society is [was] advanced, but I never said his was one of the Nietschean ones ;) I meant the Genii really; I do love those eps, but really, how stereotypical can you GET? When you've met one evil Nazi human-alien race, you've met them all... (If you've watched Stargate: SG-1 as well, that is, and Trek, and... ...) The point is not about being behind Earth--we know that the Wraith stop humans in Pegasus from developing for the most part--but that the evil, backstabbing races *always* seem to be baked in the same mould in these programmes. Why can't the enemy be a bronze-age culture that simply found and uses the Gates? Lack of modern technology never stopped the ancient Greeks, Romans, Egyptians etc. from doing a lot of damage! *Is besieged by sudden thought of somebody--I suppose it would have to be Rodney--peeking out and breathing "Zulus! Thaaasands of 'em!"*
LOL I can't believe I never thought of the Wraith shepherding pun! *Groan*
Mal is the bestest, twistedest anti-hero-anti-villain evah *ggg*
no subject
no subject
no subject
Honestly, I'd avoid that panel, because the description sounds like you've already got a set of answers you want to talk about, rather than a set of questions you want to ask.
no subject
"Hey, you have too many set ideas. That is not a panel. A panel is where you have no set ideas."
"No, a panel is like a debate - I put forth my set idea and then you put forth yours. You know, like a debate: "The sky is *not* blue. Discuss."
"Is not?"
"Is too. See?"
no subject
no subject