permetaform (
permetaform) wrote2006-10-17 06:13 am
Entry tags:
random post re:fanfiction and pro-writers
So, I wonder.
Sometimes I don't get pro-writers, and their virulent hatred towards fic. I think, perhaps is that they feel all defensive and threatened.
I wonder, because for me, fanfic is like singing; I don't sing all that well, and I don't sing professionally. But I sing because it gives me joy, I sing because I can't *help* singing. And granted, most of my singing is in the bathroom or in the car, but I'm not going around going "OMG COPYRIGHTS" to people who sing for fun, 'cause while I sometimes sing tuneless songs most of the time I sing songs made by professional songwriters/artists. And sometimes I do riff and trills and grace-notes to decorate the song because it's fun to. Because I can't help it, because it bring me joy. I make no profit from singing, and I would say that most people who sing don't do it for profit.
Will the anti-fic people wish to rail against karaoke bars now, too? For violating the copywrite laws of singers/songwriters?
This post brought to you by
metafandom and silly people.
[edit] "pro-writer" in the context of this post is referring to those who are using it as their label instead of "anti-fic", in particular the group that thinks that writing isn't valid unless you're getting paid for it (or eventually getting paid for it), and that anyone doing it for free is at best absurd and at worst a thief.
Sometimes I don't get pro-writers, and their virulent hatred towards fic. I think, perhaps is that they feel all defensive and threatened.
I wonder, because for me, fanfic is like singing; I don't sing all that well, and I don't sing professionally. But I sing because it gives me joy, I sing because I can't *help* singing. And granted, most of my singing is in the bathroom or in the car, but I'm not going around going "OMG COPYRIGHTS" to people who sing for fun, 'cause while I sometimes sing tuneless songs most of the time I sing songs made by professional songwriters/artists. And sometimes I do riff and trills and grace-notes to decorate the song because it's fun to. Because I can't help it, because it bring me joy. I make no profit from singing, and I would say that most people who sing don't do it for profit.
Will the anti-fic people wish to rail against karaoke bars now, too? For violating the copywrite laws of singers/songwriters?
This post brought to you by
[edit] "pro-writer" in the context of this post is referring to those who are using it as their label instead of "anti-fic", in particular the group that thinks that writing isn't valid unless you're getting paid for it (or eventually getting paid for it), and that anyone doing it for free is at best absurd and at worst a thief.
no subject
But that's just me.
no subject
I have so much love for the writers/TV show people around who make it clear they're fine with the fan world, including fic.
no subject
permetaform, that's a perfect analogy, at least to my ear--thanks.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Now that I've got that out of my system, I'm leaning towards the idea that some pro-writers are worried that they aren't as good as the book sales indicate*, and fanfic will prove it. That's why they loathe the idea of people playing with their toys.
*I'm assuming that book sale figures aren't based on orders by stores, but actual sales by consumers.
no subject
hmmm, yeah, I can see that defensiveness going on. And it's like the fact that...well, it's easier to make something good if you love IT a whole hella lot, instead of just loving getting PAID for it a whole hella lot.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I *almost* know what you said
Re: I *almost* know what you said
no subject
I'm going to go sing in my car now. LOVE!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
i like to credit for this attitude, but i think she'd probably feel that way even if she didn't know me. :P
no subject
no subject
I think this sentence is giving a certain segment of pro authors more weight and power than they actually have or deserve. I know more pros who have no problem with fanfic than ones who do.
no subject
Yeah, off the top of my head I can name at least five people *on my flist* who are published authors, who also write fic.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Well put.
no subject
no subject
That is probably the best explanation I have ever heard...right down to the part where I suck at singing, but like it anyway.
Well said.
no subject
no subject
If I took up the violin for fun, nobody would think that I was wasting my time because I had no plans to join the New York Philharmonic. I can sing in church choirs and in the shower and along with the radio while driving and nobody will think that I'm just pathetically apeing Toby Keith because I can't get a recording contract, or stealing Charles Wesley's lyrics because I'm too lazy to write my own hymns. If music, despite the RCAA's iron-clad copyright laws, can still be sung for fun, than why is writing fiction for fun so hard for some people to conceive of?
no subject
no subject
Incidentally, karaoke bars pay pretty hefty amounts for their systems, which include royalties to the artists whose songs they use. This is why less popular songs have a tendancy to drop out of the books; they're not worth paying the fees for if no one's singing them.
no subject
Most of the semi-pros and pros I've meet online are more curious than angry about fanfic. But then they're also speculative fiction writers that can be an od breed.
My guess on some pro-writers angry is about quality. The greater amount of fanfic writers are beginners and thus the greater amount of fanfic is not wonderfully written (although some can be wonderfully written). They may have issues with beginning writers, and with these beginning writers playing (not always well, as the pro-writer may think) with their creations.
no subject
I mean, I'm of two minds, but not enough to justify being upset about fanfiction. The fans are not making money off it (or they shouldn't be), and they're sharing their love of a book/movie with others. I don't see how it's much different from the people who take something like Emma and turn it into Clueless. That could be construed as fanfiction, in a sense.
I just don't get people sometimes.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The reasons I've heard in the anti-fic camps run the gamut from pure self-protection (fear that a fan may claim that the pro 'stole' their story when the pro publishes a sequel, new tv episode, etc.), from authors who are merely trying to protect their copyrights for financial reasons to keep their world and/or characters from slipping into the public domain, to authors who don't just like people 'freeloading' off of the hard work they did in building the universe that the fan is now playing around in. Some authors do not like fans radically changing the personalities and/or destinies of their characters.
For myself, as a mod a huge fic writing community, I figure that if a given pro writer doesn't want fanfic set in their world, I respect the writer's preference and I don't allow stuff based on their work in the community. It's not as if there is any shortage of fictional universes for fans to play in.
no subject
But...thing is, sometimes you can't help but play in the universe, because it's like breathing, because it eats your mind. What then?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And I have a sneaking suspision that there are far more published writers playing on the internet than I realize.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject