The original Debate thread
In process of being discussed/updated...erm, and contains Elizabeth and Jack musings too...
last updated around 10:30, PLEASE point out redundancies and points of disagreements...(ie, the questionmark next to Will's confidence,..)
Agreements:
Will in a fantasy world
Will has a strong childside
Will as a computer geek
Will is competent in his field of knowledge
Will's field of knowledge is a bit limited at times
Will being a dumbass sometimes
Will being young
Will growing up throughout the movie
Will is illiterate
Will's confidence(?)
Elizabeth is ruthless
Elizabeth is pirate-y
Elizabeth is adaptable in pirate situations
Elizabeth is a romantic
Jack is on Jack's side
Jack doesn't like to get his own hands dirty
Will is able to learn
Will is sheltered emotionally
Will realizes Undead Pirate
Will is rash
Will is emotionally suppressed by the established hierarchy.
Differences:
How rash IS Will?
Degree of Will's suppression by the established hierarchy
Piracy-Justifiable in the end? (would matter towards Will's view of pirates at the end)
Degree of growth in the movie
Will's competency
Will's confidence(?)
Will has logic/common sense
Trigger Paradoxes:
definition: an action that would definitively prove a characterization one way or another that is non-canon; ie. if Jack pulled the Trigger and shot Will in the smithy.
Shooting Will, y or n?
Will telling Elizabeth (in cave) he loves her
Elizabeth knowing that Jack is a pirate when she first wakes up
Will being nicely dressed at Jack's hanging
Sequel theories:
Elizabeth turning evil
Note: ok, I HAVE to study for my math final (::kicks linear algerbra books::), so I'm AWOL until about...4 pm (Pacific)? that should give jaida and cali time to come back from lunch and get settled.
In the meanwhile, feel free to leave your thoughts on the matter.
In process of being discussed/updated...erm, and contains Elizabeth and Jack musings too...
last updated around 10:30, PLEASE point out redundancies and points of disagreements...(ie, the questionmark next to Will's confidence,..)
Agreements:
Will in a fantasy world
Will has a strong childside
Will as a computer geek
Will is competent in his field of knowledge
Will's field of knowledge is a bit limited at times
Will being a dumbass sometimes
Will being young
Will growing up throughout the movie
Will is illiterate
Will's confidence(?)
Elizabeth is ruthless
Elizabeth is pirate-y
Elizabeth is adaptable in pirate situations
Elizabeth is a romantic
Jack is on Jack's side
Jack doesn't like to get his own hands dirty
Will is able to learn
Will is sheltered emotionally
Will realizes Undead Pirate
Will is rash
Will is emotionally suppressed by the established hierarchy.
Differences:
How rash IS Will?
Degree of Will's suppression by the established hierarchy
Piracy-Justifiable in the end? (would matter towards Will's view of pirates at the end)
Degree of growth in the movie
Will's competency
Will's confidence(?)
Will has logic/common sense
Trigger Paradoxes:
definition: an action that would definitively prove a characterization one way or another that is non-canon; ie. if Jack pulled the Trigger and shot Will in the smithy.
Shooting Will, y or n?
Will telling Elizabeth (in cave) he loves her
Elizabeth knowing that Jack is a pirate when she first wakes up
Will being nicely dressed at Jack's hanging
Sequel theories:
Elizabeth turning evil
Note: ok, I HAVE to study for my math final (::kicks linear algerbra books::), so I'm AWOL until about...4 pm (Pacific)? that should give jaida and cali time to come back from lunch and get settled.
In the meanwhile, feel free to leave your thoughts on the matter.
no subject
It seems that the things we have differences on are things that can't be quantified, properly, so rather than agreeing for the sake of agreeing or not agreeing at all it's more like it might take us another two days to chart those things out. XD;;
Regarding elements, yes, Will is very much earth and fire, rather than anything else; he grounds himself and then sinks deep and becomes obsessive over it.
Elizabeth? Fire and Air. She lacks a bit of focus at the wrong points (execution scene, Jack's reaction to rum), with streaks of stubborness untempered by water.
Jack is definately Water and Air. Expansive, diffusive, and infinitely flexible. Incidentally, is what makes the relationship with Elizabeth 'spark'.
Hmm... I'm going to have to disagree on this somewhat, I've already debated this out with
I don't see Will having as much fire in him so much. I'm positive he's a Capricorn, which lends a certain inflexibility to him, and colors a lot of his general characteristics. I think, if anything, his ascendent or rising sign might be an air sign, which would color his occasional detachment from things, that certain feyness about him. But this air element is only rising or ascendent, for a person that doesn't use this classification system much, don't know if you do, that means an air sign is influencing him sort of... from the edge of things. Not even sure what air sign it is.
Elizabeth sort of strikes me as a Leo. In a lot of ways, a very strong fire sign, taking into account how volitle she can be, her need for control, and her need to take charge. I can't figure out what her influences would be, though, and there's something about this assignment that I haven't squared with myself, I just don't seem to feel her character well enough to know what it is. So maybe not.
Jack, meanwhile, I'm possitive is split cleanly between fire and water, a walking contridiction, and nothing fixed about him. I feel there's definetly something burning hot in his personality, the mutability of water, but not the detachment of air. I can only see him on the Pisces/Aries cusp, in terms of classification, which was something I pinned before I went and had a look at what that cusp was supposed to entail, personality wise.
So, I agree that elementally Jack and Will are direct opposites, but I disagree on what elements their personalites match to.
should I go on my Jack and Will rant here?
You could go into it right here. :)
no subject
the elements I were referring to were less zodiac-derived than palmistry derived. (incidentally, if you want me to do a reading for you, scan your hands in and I'll see what I can do, yeah?)
but seriously I'm really interested in what you're saying about the zodiac signs, I dabble in it occasionally but more like as not most people only know their sunsigns. Incidentally, I'm a March 17th, Gemini acendant, Aries Moon. Which is probably why I'm able to tell when Jack's being out of character, but for the life of me can't pin him completely down...
no subject
On the Aries/Pisces I was also going to note, with Jack, that although he does not act so much sensitive and compassionate on the outside, he has to have an extreme sensitivity to other people's emotions/moods to be able to play them like he does.
Zodiac wise, though, it's driving me crazy that I can't get the grip on Elizabeth to chart her out. @__@
no subject
...you get stressed a lot? Like your worries overtaking your brain-type?
Either that, or do you mean the lines are unnaturally *deep*??
and yeah, I see what you mean about the character classification sys. and Virgo ascendent? lol! No wonder that debate occured...
no subject
It seems that the things we have differences on are things that can't be quantified, properly, so rather than agreeing for the sake of agreeing or not agreeing at all it's more like it might take us another two days to chart those things out. XD;;
Exactly. But I'd like them stated clearly and aboveboard so to speak so that we'd be able to take it into account in our discussion.
on elizabeth:
there's something about this assignment that I haven't squared with myself,
maybe toss in a sense of duty? loyalty? but it'd have to be weighted carefully, and maybe only through the other planets (nonAscendant/Sun/Moon) perhaps scorpio?
and:
Thankfully, Capricorns are patient, too, and are happy to wait for their ship to come in.
::gigglesnort::
ok, this is not helping, need to focus demmit, but ooo, pretty new site...
no subject
no subject
no subject
You could go into it right here. :)
It's posted up at my livejournal...